JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Gabriel Prieto·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Correccion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Referendo
  • Rechazar por cuanto error citado no afecta parte resolutiva de la sentencia C-141/10
Providencia Judicial
  • Corrección por error aritmético en cualquier tiempo, de oficio o a solicitud de parte
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de corrección de la sentencia C-141/10, ya que dentro de las personas que presentaron intervenciones ciudadanas no se incluyó el nombre del solicitante.

La Corte aclara que la no inclusión del nombre del peticionario fue un error de digitación, mas en ningún aspecto significa que no haya sido tenido en cuenta en las mismas condiciones de los demás intervenciones y dado que el error citado no altera el sentido de la decisión tomada se decide no modificar la sentencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. no MODIFICAR la sentencia C-141 de 2010.
  2. SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, COMUNÍQUESE este proveído al señor Gabriel Prieto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.